Troy J. Lenz v. Yellow Transportation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a customer service representative was not a “transportation worker” and thus not exempt un- der § 1
• holding that a customer service representative at an interstate trucking company was not a member of the relevant class
• holding that a truck driver, but not a customer service representative, is a transportation worker under § 1
• holding that a customer service representative at an interstate trucking company was not a member of the relevant class
• holding that a customer service representative, though working in trucking industry, was not actually involved in flow of goods in interstate commerce
• holding that a customer service representative was not a “transportation worker” and thus not exempt un- der § 1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).