Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 6/22/2001
Troxell v. Troxell
Citations
- 2001 OK CIV APP 96
- 28 P.3d 1169
- 72 O.B.A.J. 2232
- 2001 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 66
- 2001 WL 818351
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that retroactive indemnity provisions were invalid because they were \not in conformity with the terms of the [original] divorce decree\
- holding that retroactive indemnity provisions were invalid because they were “not in conformity with the terms of the [original] divorce decree”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carl B. Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2002-04-09· cited 80×
- Youngbluth v. YoungbluthSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-05-28· cited 33×
- Morgan v. MorganMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-04-01· cited 14×
- Mallard v. BurkartMississippi Supreme Court· 2012-08-30· cited 11×
- Hodge v. HodgeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2008-09-12· cited 5×
- Hayes v. HayesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-02-28· cited 5×
- Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2003-08-19· cited 2×
- In Re Marriage of GuyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-08-17
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.