Troupiansky v. Henry Disston & Sons, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dissenting shareholders of one party to a de facto merger were held entitled to sue the other party, which had become a subsidiary by acquiring the former’s assets in exchange for stock, but the parent was dismissed because not a party to the de facto merger

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).