Troupe v. McAuley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a witness tendered as an expert in neurosurgery was not qualified to testify against a neuro-otolaryngologist
• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by ruling that neurosurgeon was not qualified to testify as to the standard of care for a neuro-otolaryngologist
• finding no abuse of discretion in disallowing testimony by neurologist as to appropriate standard of care which “a neuro-otolaryngologist performing middle ear surgery” owed to his patient
• finding a neurosurgeon was not qualified to testify regarding otolaryngology

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).