Skip to main content
· 12/8/1913

Troupe v. Hause

Citations

  • 55 Pa. Super. 450
  • 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 393

Syllabus

<p>Contract — Building contract — Evidence—Itemized statement of account.</p> <p>1. In an action to recover a balance alleged to be due on a building contract it is proper to admit in evidence an itemized statement of the work and materials furnished, where it appears that such statement was rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant two years before the trial, and that the latter had not returned it or disputed its correctness.</p> <p>■ 2. In such a case the appellate court will not reverse the findings of the trial judge who tried the case without a jury, where it appears that such findings are sustained by competent evidence, and there is no manifest error.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.