Troup v. Fischer Steel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the first reduction would occur when the jury apportioned fault to the employer and the second would occur when the workers’ compensation insurance carrier exercised its right to subrogation against the plaintiffs recovery from the third party
• comparative fault of employer could not be considered in employee’s tort action against third-party defendant where workers’ compensation law precluded employer’s liability in tort
• comparative fault of employer could not be considered in employee’s tort action against third-party defendant where workers’ compensation law precluded employer’s liability in 3 tort
• roofer injured while moving pallet

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).