Troup v. Chambers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding attorney crossed line of justified criticism by accusing judge of improper communication with jurors with reckless disregard for assertion's falsity
• violation when lawyer used profanity in criticizing the legal proceedings to the judge and court staff and repeatedly accused the judge of speaking improperly with jurors and being prejudiced against the lawyer and client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).