Trouble v. Wet Seal, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant “waived any available advice of counsel defense by objecting, based on the attorney-client privilege, to [the plaintiff’s] discovery requests”
• “opposing counsel is entitled to know not only whether such an opinion was obtained but also its content and what conduct it advised”
• “[The] proffered testimony . . . must not only have a reliable foundation but also be relevant in that it ‘fits’ the facts of this case.”
• \[The] proffered testimony . . . must not only have a reliable foundation but also be relevant in that it 'fits' the facts of this case.\
• “[w]hen a party intends to rely at trial on the advice of counsel as a defense to a claim of bad faith, that advice becomes a factual issue”
• “Survey evidence must be excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 where it is so flawed in methodology that its probative value is substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).