Trouble v. Wet Seal, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant “waived any available advice of counsel defense by objecting, based on the attorney-client privilege, to [the plaintiff’s] discovery requests”
• “opposing counsel is entitled to know not only whether such an opinion was obtained but also its content and what conduct it advised”
• “[The] proffered testimony . . . must not only have a reliable foundation but also be relevant in that it ‘fits’ the facts of this case.”
• \[The] proffered testimony . . . must not only have a reliable foundation but also be relevant in that it 'fits' the facts of this case.\
• “[w]hen a party intends to rely at trial on the advice of counsel as a defense to a claim of bad faith, that advice becomes a factual issue”
• “Survey evidence must be excluded under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 where it is so flawed in methodology that its probative value is substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Malletier v. Dooney & Bourke, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2007-12-13· cited 108×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 2004-10-28· cited 75×
• BOYLE v. ASAP ENERGY, INC.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2017-10-24· cited 44×
• Gameologist Group, LLC v. Scientific Games International, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2011-10-25· cited 41×
• Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2009-06-05· cited 37×
• U.S. Information Systems, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union Number 3
  S.D. New York· 2004-02-24· cited 37×
• Kenneth Parker v. Reda, C.O., Norfleet, C.O., Krusen, Sgt. & Rita A. Brannen, and Estate of Charles Harrison, Sing Sing Corr. Fac. & C. Grainer, Supt.
  Second Circuit· 2003-04-28· cited 30×
• Akiro LLC v. House of Cheatham, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2013-05-17· cited 30×
• King v. Town of Wallkill
  S.D. New York· 2004-02-13· cited 25×
• Brockmeyer v. HEARTS CORP.
  S.D. New York· 2003-03-04· cited 24×
• THOIP v. Walt Disney Co.
  S.D. New York· 2010-02-09· cited 20×
• Park West Radiology v. Carecore National LLC
  S.D. New York· 2009-11-19· cited 20×
• CSX Corp. v. Children's Investment Fund Management (UK) LLP
  S.D. New York· 2008-06-11· cited 12×
• Midwest Guaranty Bank v. Guaranty Bank
  E.D. Michigan· 2003-06-05· cited 12×
• Minnesota Specialty Crops, Inc. v. Minnesota Wild Hockey Club, L.P.
  D. Minnesota· 2002-08-09· cited 12×
• We Media Inc. v. General Electric Co.
  S.D. New York· 2002-08-23· cited 11×
• Cary Oil Co., Inc. v. MG Refining & Marketing, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2003-04-24· cited 10×
• CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. v. Graco Fishing & Rental Tools, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2011-09-23· cited 9×
• Rexall Sundown, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.
  E.D. New York· 2010-04-12· cited 8×
• UBER Promotions, Inc. v. UBER Technologies, Inc.
  N.D. Florida· 2016-02-16· cited 8×