Skip to main content
· 4/30/1965

Trotter v. Stephens

Citations

  • 241 F. Supp. 33
  • 1965 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sustaining search where defendant’s “automobile was an instrumentality of the crime, and unlike Preston * * * it was examined closely at the time of arrest and searched a few hours later”
  • held search of car obtained incident to and contemporaneous with arrest of defendant “was merely part of one continuous act, even though interrupted by the arrest of [codefendant] in the interim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon E. Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.