TROP, INC. Et Al. v. CITY OF BROOKHAVEN Et Al.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Code did not violate Pink Pony's right to free speech by \separating alcohol from adult entertainment\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• concluding that the Code did not violate Pink Pony’s right to free speech by “separating alcohol from adult entertainment” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that a similar sexually oriented business regulation was content-neutral
• holding that a similar sexually oriented business regulation was content-neutral
• explaining that the trial court was correct in concluding that the Pink Pony did not have standing to challenge the Brookhaven alcohol code because the club had never applied for an alcohol license
• explaining that the trial court was correct in concluding that the Pink Pony did not have standing to challenge the Brookhaven alcohol code because the club had never applied for an alcohol license

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).