Troncoso v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although Troncoso was carrying drugs and not a weapon, the “bulge” in his clothing and his “efforts to conceal it” gave the officer reasonable suspicion that Troncoso had a weapon
• “[The Virginia] Supreme Court has steadfastly refused to extend [the exclusionary] rule to encompass evidence seized pursuant to statutory violations, absent an express statutory provision for suppression.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).