Trombetta v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegations that an employee was discharged for refusing to falsify pollution control reports required by law to be filed with state agency state a claim for which relief can be granted under Michigan law
• holding that allegations that an employee was discharged for refusing to falsify pollution control reports required by law to be filed with state agency state a claim for which relief can be granted under Michigan law
• recognizing public policy claim when plaintiff was terminated after “he refused to manipulate and adjust sampling results used for pollution control reports”
• stating, in dicta, that it would have been impermissible for the employee to be discharged for refusing to falsify pollution control reports that are required to be filed with the state
• refusing to perform catheterizations for which employee was not properly licensed
• refusing to perform catheterizations for which employee was not properly licensed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).