Skip to main content
· 6/3/1974

Troll v. Borut

Citations

  • 417 U.S. 932
  • 94 S. Ct. 2644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a litigant “has a duty to provide authority for any argument that he raises”
  • stating that “criminal complaint was an absolutely privileged document” and that any defamation stemmed from that public court document, not from statements made to news reporter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.