Skip to main content
· 11/19/1964

Troidl v. Keough

Citations

  • 44 Misc. 2d 548
  • 254 N.Y.S.2d 240
  • 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2311
  • 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the Board “has the authority to review the undisputed facts in the entire record”
  • emphasizing that \if the BIA failed to appropriately apply clear-error review . . . then we would retain jurisdiction.\
  • pointing out that petitioner failed to cite any precedential BIA decisions but going on to address the trend in unpublished cases
  • pausing to explain the intricacies of immigration procedure and review
  • further detailing the clear-error standard applied by the BIA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lawless

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.