Troglin v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• giving PTSD diagnosis little weight where the evidence failed to showed that 8 petitioner “could not appreciate right from wrong or conform his conduct to the 9 requirements of law”
• discussing and distinguishing State v. Graham, 135 Ariz. 209, 660 P.2d 460 (1983); State v. Trostle, 191 Ariz. 4, 951 P.2d 869, 885 (1997) (discussing and relying on State v. Richmond, 114 Ariz. 186, 560 P.2d 41, 52–53 (1976))
• discussing and distinguishing State v. Graham, 660 P.2d 460 (Ariz. 1983); State v. Trostle, 951 P.2d 869, 885 (Ariz. 1997) (discussing and relying on State v. Richmond, 560 P.2d 41, 52–53 (Ariz. 1976)). See also State v. Stuard, 863 P.2d 881, 902 (Ariz. 1993
• discussing and distinguishing State v. Graham, 660 P.2d 460 (Ariz. 1983); State v. Trostle, 951 P.2d 869, 885 (Ariz. 1997) (discussing and relying on State v. Richmond, 560 P.2d 41, 52–53 (Ariz. 1976)). See also State v. Stuard, 863 P.2d 881, 902 (Ariz. 1993

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).