Skip to main content
· 9/23/1986

Troedel v. Wainwright

Citations

  • 667 F. Supp. 1456
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel’s failure to depose the State’s expert, and more important, failure to con- sult with an expert in order to contradict key evidence of the “most crucial aspect of the trial” was deficient
  • finding counsel's failure to consult an expert, depose witnesses, and conduct an independent investigation despite the fact that \counsel himself had no special knowledge in the field\ to constitute deficient performance
  • prosecutorial remarks simply outlining the sentencing and review procedures in capital cases cannot, even if improper, have affected the guilt or sentencing decision; sentence vacated on other grounds
  • prosecutorial remarks simply outlining the sentencing and review procedures in capital cases cannot, even if improper, have affected the guilt or sentencing decision; sentence vacated on other grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kehoe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.