Triumph Packaging Group v. Ward

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parallelism existed where “the state court is set to resolve Freed’s argument”
• noting that Judge Pantle’s rulings as of 2013 had “been extremely unfavorable,” which made it “obvious as obvious can be” that Freed’s fragmented litigation strategy was “an effort to evade Judge Pantle’s courtroom”
• “If Weiss did not breach contractual and fiduciary duties owed to Freed, than Chase cannot be liable for having induced or aided and abetted a breach.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).