Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Pennsylvania

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that when imposing a filing injunction: (1) the order should be entered only in exigent circumstances, such as when a litigant continuously abuses the judicial process by filing meritless and repetitive actions; (2
• recognizing implicit repeal in 4 V.I. Code § 32
• explaining that a district court may enter a filing injunction if (1) the litigant has “contin- uous[ly] abuse[d] . . . the judicial process by filing meritless and repetitive actions”; (2) the litigant has notice of a proposed injunction; and (3
• affirming district court’s authority to limit filings by a pro se litigant after fair warning and an opportunity to be heard
• construing § 22(a), 48 U.S.C. § 1612 to find that District Court of Virgin Islands has exclusive federal jurisdiction
• affirming district court’s authority to limit filings by a pro se litigant after fair warning and an opportunity to be heard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).