· 9/24/1991
Triple E Produce Corp. v. Valencia
Citations
- 824 P.2d 771
- 170 Ariz. 375
- 96 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 145
- 1991 Ariz. App. LEXIS 266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating rule in Fay not intended as “an immutable rule that an error in the computation of the balance is excusable only if the correct amount can be ascertained from the face of the affidavit”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Livermore, Lacagnina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.