Skip to main content
· 9/24/1991

Triple E Produce Corp. v. Valencia

Citations

  • 824 P.2d 771
  • 170 Ariz. 375
  • 96 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 145
  • 1991 Ariz. App. LEXIS 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating rule in Fay not intended as “an immutable rule that an error in the computation of the balance is excusable only if the correct amount can be ascertained from the face of the affidavit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Livermore, Lacagnina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.