Skip to main content
· 1/16/2001

Triple E, Inc. v. Hendrix and Dail, Inc.

Citations

  • 543 S.E.2d 245
  • 344 S.C. 186
  • 43 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 533
  • 2001 S.C. App. LEXIS 12

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • hold-ing that statements in advertising materials may constitute express warranties and citing opinions from numerous jurisdictions also holding that advertising materials may constitute express warranties
  • citing: Gherna v. Ford Motor Co., 246 Cal.App.2d 639, 55 Cal.Rptr. 94 (1966); Torres v. Northwest Engineering Co., 86 Hawai'i 383, 949 P.2d 1004 (1997); Scheuler v. Aamco Transmissions, Inc., 1 Kan.App.2d 525, 571 P.2d 48 (1977
  • citing: Gherna v. Ford Motor Co., 246 Cal.App.2d 639, 55 Cal.Rptr. 94 (1966); Torres v. Northwest Engineering Co., 86 Hawai'i 383, 949 P.2d 1004 (1997); Scheuler v. Aamco Transmissions, Inc., 1 Kan.App.2d 525, 571 P.2d 48 (1977); Courtney v. Bassano, 733 A.2d 973 (Me.1999

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goolsby, Cureton, Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.