Skip to main content
· 8/16/1989

TRIPLE a MACHINE SHOP, INC v. State of California

Citations

  • 213 Cal. App. 3d 131
  • 261 Cal. Rptr. 493
  • 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 842

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rule prohibiting communication with represented individual in absence of opposing counsel applies to criminal as well as civil cases
  • Injunction on ex parte contact with employee was improper
  • assuming Rule 2-100 can apply to prosecutors
  • assuming Rule 2-100 can apply to prosecutors
  • assuming Rule 2-100 can apply to prosecutors
  • assuming Rule 2-100 can apply to prosecutors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.