Skip to main content
· 11/3/2009

Tripati v. FORWITH

Citations

  • 219 P.3d 291
  • 223 Ariz. 81
  • 568 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 11
  • 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a final order denying a Rule 60(c) motion is appealable pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-2101(A)(3) (2016)
  • “A signed order is necessary because the time for appeal can be calculated only from the filing of a signed order.”
  • the “notice of appeal, although premature, became effective upon entry of the signed order denying his motion for new trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gemmill, Norris, Kessler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.