· 11/3/2009
Tripati v. FORWITH
Citations
- 219 P.3d 291
- 223 Ariz. 81
- 568 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 11
- 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 753
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a final order denying a Rule 60(c) motion is appealable pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-2101(A)(3) (2016)
- “A signed order is necessary because the time for appeal can be calculated only from the filing of a signed order.”
- the “notice of appeal, although premature, became effective upon entry of the signed order denying his motion for new trial”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gemmill, Norris, Kessler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.