Triology Variety Stores, Ltd. v. City Products Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing between equitable and promissory estoppel, explaining that “[e]quitable estoppel depends on a misrepresentation of an existing fact, while promissory estoppel requires a promise concerning future intent”
• plaintiff’s allegation that he was induced to expend $93,000 was sufficient to support a finding of substantial injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).