Skip to main content
· 5/7/2007

Trinity Products, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross v. Burgess Steel, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant/cross

Citations

  • 486 F.3d 325
  • 62 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 904
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 10787
  • 2007 WL 1309028

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no abuse of discretion in denying a motion for additur when the jury “obviously” found the actual damages were less than the market value
  • reversing summary judgment in favor of counterclaim defendant where counterclaimant claimed counterclaim defendant’s limitation of remedies resulted in the remedy failing its essential purpose and the district court had not considered that claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Murphy, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.