Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 5/7/2004
Trimble v. State
Citations
- 849 A.2d 83
- 157 Md. App. 73
- 2004 Md. App. LEXIS 81
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that proceeding under DNA postconviction statute is “not part of the criminal proceeding itself’ and is “in fact considered to be civil in nature”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, James, Getty, Marvin, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
- Trimble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-17· cited 108×
- Melton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-12· cited 63×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-01-13· cited 48×
- Trimble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-07· cited 46×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-01-21· cited 20×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-12-26· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.