Trimble v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[M]erely speculating that an unidentified policy and uncorroborated practice or custom exists without providing any 20 factual heft to support the allegation is insufficient to state a claim under § 1983.”
• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over remaining state law claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).