Trihealth, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners, Hamilton County, Ohio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff \had not carried its heavy burden of negativing every conceivable basis for the Board's decision\
• finding that two groups of hospitals were not similarly situated for equal protection purposes because “they differ[ed] in several material respects”
• noting that “disparate treatment of persons is reasonably justified if they are dissimilar in some material respect”
• explaining that a party “cannot have a protected property interest in the procedure itself, whereby the contract was or ought to have been awarded”
• stating that the Equal Protection Clause “prohibits discrimination by government which either burdens a fundamental right, targets a suspect class, or intentionally treats one differently than others similarly situated without any rational basis for the difference”
• stating that the Equal Protection Clause “prohibits discrimination by government which either burdens a fundamental right, targets a suspect class, or intentionally treats one differently than others similarly situated without any rational basis for the difference”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).