Trigally v. Mayor of Memphis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that victim, as owner, was qualified to testify as to the value of property stolen from him, particularly a family heirloom
• holding that the owner’s own estimate of value that was “based on what his jeweler and his wife had told him” was sufficient to support the order of restitution
• stating that restitu tion in a juvenile proceeding under section 39.054(l)(f), Florida Statutes (1995), the predecessor to current section 985.437, “is treated the same as restitution in adult proceedings under section 775.089”
• “The trial court has broad discretion to take into account any factor in arriving at a fair amount that will compensate the victim for his or her loss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).