Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/13/1961
Trieschman v. Eaton
Citations
- 166 A.2d 892
- 224 Md. 111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating in dicta that “[t]he definition of the [UCATA] making those jointly or severally liable for the same injury literally embraces successive wrongdoers liable for the same injury even though one may also be liable to the injured person for additional damages”
- “[T]he first tortfeasor is liable for the additional damage added to the original harm by the acts of a negligent doctor (who, of course, is also liable for the additional damage).”
- “successive wrongdoers liable for the same harm”
- \successive wrongdoers liable for the same harm\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bruñe, Henderson, Hammond, Horney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-25· cited 71×
- Exxon Corp. v. YaremaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-06· cited 69×
- Consumer Protection Division v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-05-13· cited 52×
- Morgan v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-04-07· cited 46×
- Underwood-Gary v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-28· cited 41×
- Boehmer v. BoggianoSupreme Court of Missouri· 1967-02-13· cited 34×
- Selby v. KuhnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1963-03-20· cited 29×
- Loh v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-11-07· cited 28×
- Rager v. Superior Coach Sales & Service of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1973-12-03· cited 26×
- Hansen v. CollettNevada Supreme Court· 1963-04-04· cited 24×
- Kyte v. McMillionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-12-09· cited 22×
- Huff v. HarbaughCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-10-07· cited 20×
- Merced v. Gobierno de la CapitalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1962-05-28· cited 14×
- Cleaveland v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-04-05· cited 12×
- Buckley v. Brethren Mutual InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-26· cited 12×
- In Re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos LitigationS.D. New York· 1995-01-19· cited 11×
- Bell v. Allstate Insur. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-06-08· cited 10×
- Findley v. FaliseE.D. New York· 1995-01-19· cited 8×
- Talcott v. Central Bank and Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-04-27· cited 7×
- Nunez v. HornD. Puerto Rico· 1970-10-05· cited 5×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McKenna v. AustinD.C. Circuit· 1943-02-11· cited 149×
- Hilbert v. RothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-03-20· cited 142×
- United States v. SillimanThird Circuit· 1948-03-25· cited 102×
- Ash v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1944-08-11· cited 100×
- Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-08-15· cited 86×
- Daily v. SombergSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1958-12-01· cited 66×
- Stockton v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1846-12-15· cited 50×
- Maryland Lumber Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1954-07-02· cited 29×
- Berkley v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1898-02-10· cited 26×
- Dickow v. CookinhamCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-02-05· cited 23×
- Neidig v. WhitefordCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1868-06-23· cited 19×
- Applegate v. RiggallSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1958-12-15· cited 16×
- Campbell v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1855-12-15· cited 9×
- Raleigh v. PetersonM.D. Pennsylvania· 1958-07-31· cited 8×
- Jones v. RickettsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1854-12-15· cited 6×
- Downey v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1872-01-31· cited 5×
- McVey v. ManattSupreme Court of Iowa· 1890-05-17· cited 4×
- United States v. SillimanSupreme Court· 1948-10-11· cited 4×
- Shainwald v. LewisN.D. California· 1889-04-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.