Tricome v. Chunias

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a reasonable belief cannot be “wholly untethered” from the statutory provisions at issue
• noting plaintiff abandoned certain claims in part because he failed to “oppos[e] the motion to dismiss on [those] issue[s]”
• affirming dismissal of whistleblower claim for failure to allege facts supporting reporter’s objectively reasonable belief that reported conduct violated federal law
• listing “perceived misconduct in ,.. accounting practices” among examples of well-pleaded allegations of conduct that an employee might reasonably believe violates the securities laws
• applying Skidmore deference but noting that “the purported whistleblower’s belief cannot exist wholly untethered from [the specific provisions allegedly violated]”
• adopting ARB interpretation of whistleblower retaliation provision of the 15 violate a federal railroad safety edict, he has engaged in FRSA-protected activity. See id. at . The Cieslicki holding comports with subsection(a)(2)’s plain text. See § 20109(a)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).