Skip to main content
· 5/28/2003

Trico Marine Assets Inc. v. Diamond B Marine Services Inc.

Citations

  • 332 F.3d 779
  • 2003 A.M.C. 1355
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10645
  • 2003 WL 21223992

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the valuation misstatement penalty “does not differentiate between factual and legal determinations” and can apply “where the transaction is ‘recast’ for tax purposes using a legal doctrine such as the step transaction or economic substance doctrine”
  • holding that the valuation misstatement penalty \does not differentiate between factual and legal determinations\ and can apply \where the transaction is 'recast' for tax purposes using a legal doctrine such as the step transaction or economic substance doctrine\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Demoss, Jones, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.