Skip to main content
· 12/8/1887

Trice v. Kayton

Citations

  • 84 Va. 217
  • 4 S.E. 377
  • 1887 Va. LEXIS 25

Syllabus

<p>1. Deeds—Covenants—Quiet enjoyment—Highways—Case at bar.—Lot in N. city was sold and conveyed by metes and bounds with covenants for quiet enjoyment, free from encumbrances. Later, it was ascertained that the house and fence encroached upon the street. City required their removal. Purchaser removed them, and sued grantor for breach of covenants :</p> <p>Held :</p> <p>Plaintiff entitled to recover. Encroachment of house and fence upon the street, was a hidden fact, not in contemplation when the sale was made.</p> <p>2. Cases Distinguished.—Jordan v. Eve, 31 Gratt., 1, differs from case at bar in that, in the former case, the highway was known to purchaser, and included in the contract.</p>

Judges: Lacy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.