Tribune Media Company v.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mentioning Stem in concurring opinion responding to Judge Krause's concurrence in One20ne; not relevant for current analysis
• instructing courts to “fashion whatever relief is practicable instead of declining review simply because full relief is not available”
• dismissing appeal in part because court found that revocation of settlement in plan would harm third-parties, including those who invested in reliance on settlement
• listing, as a second and related reason supporting an equitable mootness dismissal, that the appellants failed to obtain a stay of the confirmation order pending appeal
• describing the doctrine as narrow and instructing that courts apply it “with a scalpel rather than an axe” (quoting Alberta Energy Partners v. Blast Energy Servs., Inc. (In re Blast Energy Servs., Inc.), 593 F.3d 418, 425 (5th Cir. 2010)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).