Triantiphyllides v. Joline

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding at summary judgment that plaintiffs stated an FHA disparate impact claim where group members were “more than three times as likely to be adversely impacted” than non-members
• “Using methodology explained in his report, Dr. Bradford found that the Briarwood policy impacted families with children in a statistically significant and disproportionate way.”
• finding “households with children [we]re more than three times as likely to be adversely impacted by the rule when compared to comparable households with no children” and holding that statistical disparity was substantial enough to establish a prima facie disparate impact case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).