Triad International Maintenance Corp. v. Aim Aviation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a 3.6-month difference in median wait time was “marginal” and so did “not weigh strongly in favor of transfer”
• finding a roughly two-and-a-half months’ difference in speed to trial “only marginally shorter” in a congestion analysis
• finding a roughly two-and-a-half months’ difference in speed to trial “only marginally shorter” in a congestion analysis
• finding argument newly raised in reply brief not properly before the court
• “Reply briefs . . . may not inject new grounds. . . .[, and an] argument [that] was not contained in the main brief . . . is not before the Court.”
• noting evidence of differences in dockets presented by moving party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).