· 2/7/2012
Tri-Valley Cares v. U.S. Department of Energy
Citations
- 671 F.3d 1113
- 42 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20043
- 2012 WL 373125
- 74 ERC (BNA) 1554
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 2394
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the decision to deny a motion for failure to comply 28 | with local rules is within the district court’s discretion
- noting “[d]enial of a motion as 13 the result of a failure to comply with local rules is well within a district court’s discretion”
- recognizing post-decisional bar to extra-record materials in NEPA cases
- “Denial of a motion as the result of a failure 17 to comply with local rules is well within a district court’s discretion.”
- “Denial of a motion as the result of a failure to comply with local rules is well 18 within a district court’s discretion.”
- “Denial of a motion as the result of a failure to comply with local rules is well 18 within a district court’s discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Noonan, Smith, Rakoff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.