Skip to main content
· 6/12/1975

Tri-State Systems, Inc. v. Village Outlet Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 217 S.E.2d 399
  • 135 Ga. App. 81
  • 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In general, unless . . . lost profits are capable of definite ascertainment, and are traceable directly to the acts of the other party, they are not recoverable”
  • claim for lost profits must be supported by specific facts and supporting data
  • assertion by company’s president that his business was damaged in the amount of $40,000 was “without value in the absence of any records or statements reflecting the store’s previous and present profits or losses”
  • Witness’s assertion that his business was damaged in the amount of $40,000 was without value in the absence of statements or records reflecting the business’s previous and present profits or losses.
  • a “bold assertion” by a business owner as to the amount of lost profits has no evidentiary value “in the absence of any records or statements reflecting the store’s previous and present profits or losses”
  • a “bold assertion” by a business owner as to the amount of lost profits has no evidentiary value “in the absence of any records or statements reflecting the store’s previous and present profits or losses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pannell, Quillian, Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.