Skip to main content
· 7/9/2002

Tri-State Employment Services, Inc. v. The Mountbatten Surety Company, Inc.

Citations

  • 295 F.3d 256
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 13810
  • 2002 WL 1466822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a “[d]efendant [who] failed to raise any venue challenge in a pre-answer motion or responsive pleading . . . is deemed to have waived any objection to venue”
  • observing that a defendant who “fail[s] to raise [a] venue challenge in a pre-answer motion or responsive pleading . . . is deemed to have waived any objection to venue”
  • “[A] surety bond attaches to the principal con tract and must be construed in conjunction with it.”
  • ʺ[V]enue was (and remains) a privilege personal to each defendant, which . . . is waived by him unless timely objection is interposed.ʺ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[B]ecause defendant failed to raise any venue challenge in a pre-answer motion or responsive pleading, see [Rule] 12(h)(1)(B), defendant is deemed to have waived any objection to venue.”
  • “[TJhe filing of an amended complaint will not revive the right to present by motion defenses that were available but were not asserted in timely 3 || fashion prior to the amendment of the pleading.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabresi, Cabranes, Amon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.