Skip to main content
D. Delaware· 4/14/2010

TRI-M GROUP, LLC v. Sharp

Citations

  • 705 F. Supp. 2d 335
  • 16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 4
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37063
  • 2010 WL 1485672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • summarizing testimonial evidence showing that Delaware's permanent place of business requirement was enacted to retaliate against Pennsylvania for failing to recognize Delaware-registered apprentices
  • summarizing testimonial evidence showing that Delaware’s permanent place of business requirement was enacted to retaliate against Pennsylvania for failing to recognize Delaware-registered apprentices
  • “In essence, defendant argues that the DDOL cannot take out-of-state companies at their word, but did exactly that with respect to its investigation of plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sue L. Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.