· 2/13/2003
Tri, Inc. v. Boise Cascade Office Products, Inc. Honeywell, Inc.
Citations
- 315 F.3d 915
- 2003 WL 56918
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding an argument -15- regarding discovery was “not preserved for appeal” absent “indication [the appellant] brought these discovery complaints to the attention of the district court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman, Arnold, Loken
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.