Skip to main content
· 2/13/2003

Tri, Inc. v. Boise Cascade Office Products, Inc. Honeywell, Inc.

Citations

  • 315 F.3d 915
  • 2003 WL 56918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an argument -15- regarding discovery was “not preserved for appeal” absent “indication [the appellant] brought these discovery complaints to the attention of the district court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Arnold, Loken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.