Skip to main content
· 2/18/2016

Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 757

Citations

  • 276 Or. App. 513
  • 368 P.3d 50
  • 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that law enforcement is required to read Miranda warnings only in “interrogations that are custodial”
  • explaining that the determination of whether “a given image is [CSAM]” depends on human judgment, and therefore the labeling as such for future hashing purposes does as well
  • holding Cellebrite reports generally non-testimonial, except where algorithms offered opinions about extracted data
  • acknowledging that computer restrictions may be warranted in certain circumstances
  • “The hash value of a file standing alone [tells] little; it . . . is just raw data.”
  • “A thumbnail is a reduced-size version of a frame in a video.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hadlock, Lagesen, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.