· 2/18/2016
Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 757
Citations
- 276 Or. App. 513
- 368 P.3d 50
- 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 191
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that law enforcement is required to read Miranda warnings only in “interrogations that are custodial”
- explaining that the determination of whether “a given image is [CSAM]” depends on human judgment, and therefore the labeling as such for future hashing purposes does as well
- holding Cellebrite reports generally non-testimonial, except where algorithms offered opinions about extracted data
- acknowledging that computer restrictions may be warranted in certain circumstances
- “The hash value of a file standing alone [tells] little; it . . . is just raw data.”
- “A thumbnail is a reduced-size version of a frame in a video.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hadlock, Lagesen, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.