Tri County Industries, Inc., a Maryland Corporation v. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cautioning against the use of substantive due process to address constitutional challenges directly governed by an explicit constitutional provision
• noting that “unlike procedural due process, under which there may be recovery even for nominal damages,” a substantive due process claim has “a substantiality requirement built in” and is limited to “actions that in their totality are genuinely drastic”
• cautioning against the use of substantive due process to address constitutional challenges directly governed by an explicit constitutional provision
• rejecting substantive due process claim where plaintiff failed to pursue available remedy under D.C. regulation allowing for appeal of agency action
• cautioning against the use of substantive due process to address constitutional challenges directly governed by an explicit constitutional provision
• cautioning against the use of substantive due process to address constitutional challenges directly governed by an explicit constitutional provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).