Trezvant v. Fidelity Employer Services Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an unsupported allegation of a common plan” is insufficient for conditional certification
• noting that an “unsupported allegation of a common plan” is insufficient for conditional certification
• stating that “[a]lthough there are clear differences between [plaintiffs’] . . . positions, there are sufficient similarities to have warranted a finding, at this initial phase, that these positions are similarly situated”
• noting that an “unsupported allegation of a common plan” is insufficient for conditional certification and limiting certification to office where employees worked because defendant “made no admission that they classify all [employees] as exempt”
• collecting cases granting Rule 23 class certification to state wage violations not contingent on FLSA violations, where plaintiffs also alleged FLSA violations
• defining “substantial allegations” as “detailed allegations supported by affidavits that successfully engage defendant’s allegations to the contrary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).