Trexler v. Lutz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a right-of-way passes through both fields and unenclosed woodlands, the entirety of the right-of-way falls under the Unenclosed Woodlands Act
• holding that a property owner’s act of blocking an easement was permissible pursuant to the Unenclosed Woodlands Act
• holding that when a right-of-way passes through both fields and unenclosed woodlands, the entirety of the right-of-way falls under the Unenclosed Woodlands Act
• holding that when a right-of-way passes through both fields and unenclosed woodlands, the entirety of the right-of-way falls under the Unenclosed Woodlands Act
• holding that a property owner’s act of blocking an easement was permissible pursuant to the Unenclosed Woodlands Act
• holding that a property owner’s act of blocking an easement was permissible pursuant to the Unenclosed Woodlands Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).