· 4/24/2024
Trethewey v. Trethewey
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that federal courts “look 16 through” unexplained rulings of higher state courts to the last reasoned decision
- explaining that federal courts “look 11 through” unexplained rulings of higher state courts to the last reasoned decision
- explaining that federal courts “look through” unexplained habeas ruling of higher 25 state courts to the last reasoned decision
- explaining that federal courts “look 2 through” unexplained rulings of higher state courts to the last reasoned decision
- applying Chapman to judicial trial error: error was not harmless because the defendant’s testimony was central to his defense
- “It is logical to conclude that if a case 21 presents an issue close enough for reasonable minds to differ, then a state court’s decision 22 resolving the issue, even if incorrect, would not be objectively unreasonable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.