Tres v. Royal Surplus Lines Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 627.727(2) “only requires an issuer of a non-primary policy to notify an applicant of the avail- ability of UM coverage”
• observing that subsection (1) applies to primary policies and \differs substantially\ from subsection (2), which \deals with non-primary policies\ such as an umbrella policy
• noting that section 627.727(2) deals with non-primary policies and “differs substantially from section 627.727(1), which deals with primary policies”
• observing that \section 627.727(2) does not contain the same requirements\ as section 627.727(1), but instead \only requires an issuer of a non-primary policy to notify an applicant of the availability of UM coverage\
• “[S]ection 627.727(2) . . . only requires an issuer of a non-primary policy to notify an applicant of the availability of UM coverage.”
• § 627.727(2) does not contain the same requirements as § 627.727(1); § 627.727(2) only requires an issuer of a non-primary policy to notify an applicant of the availability of UM coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).