Skip to main content

Trepal v. State

Citations

  • 754 So. 2d 702
  • 2000 WL 263684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that to obtain review on the merits of a nonfinal postconviction order the appellant must show both the order (1) failed to conform to the essential requirements of law and (2) could cause irreparable injury that cannot be remedied on appeal
  • “We emphasize that our review of interlocutory orders is limited to postconviction proceedings following imposition of the death penalty . . . .”
  • “This - 32 - Indeed, the district courts of appeal were given express authority to review certain nonfinal and specified final orders— including rule 1.540 orders—“entered on an authorized and timely motion for relief from judgment.” Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.