Skip to main content
· 8/2/2005

Trend Homes, Inc. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 411
  • 131 Cal. App. 4th 950
  • 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6844
  • 2005 Daily Journal DAR 9339
  • 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[t]here ... is no element of surprise, since the provision is clearly written, entirely capitalized, and easily understood”
  • describing judicial reference as a process that “involves sending a pending trial court action to a referee for hearing, determination and a report back to the court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gomes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.