Skip to main content

Treisman v. Kamen

Citations

  • 126 N.H. 372
  • 493 A.2d 466
  • 1985 N.H. LEXIS 311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in passing on nuisance claims, zoning ordinances are highly persuasive indications of what society considers reasonable in the use of property
  • “We therefore hold that when the legality of a defendant’s conduct is to be judged under a zoning ordinance, the defendant who claims the benefit of the accessory use doctrine has the burden to raise it by his pleading’’ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Souter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.