Trebelhorn v. Prime Wimbledon SPE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Court held in Piper that \the fact that a defendant may be engaged in reverse forum shopping ... should not enter the district court's analysis\
• noting that a “private interest [factor] strongly favoring dismissal is [defendant’s] inability to implead potential third-party defendants in domestic litigation,” even though defendant could (in theory
• noting that the Court held in Piper that “the fact that a defendant may be engaged in reverse forum shopping . . . should not enter the district court’s analysis”
• finding significant that evidence relevant to a party's defenses was located in Brazil outside the reach of American courts
• defendant’s inability to implead potential third-party defendants strongly favored dismissal so that all claims could be litigated together in Brazil
• affirming dismissal where underlying events occurred in Brazil

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).